God Sleeps in Rwanda

Upon watching God Sleeps in Rwanda, I learned that women of Rwanda have had to endure a lot.  According to the short film, women's pasts were chaotic - many of whom were comparably young.  In 1994, Rwanda's Hutu government conducted an "ethnic cleansing" against it's Tutsi minority.  For some women, their pasts were packed with hardships such as (but not limited to) loss of family due to genocide and/or being a rape victim.  The latter could subsequently have led to the contraction of HIV/AIDS, or becoming impregnated - both of which would be quite shocking and life-changing, especially initially.  For those young women who had been in school and their families had suffered the loss of their parents, many had to stop going to school in order to take care of their younger siblings, giving up what some believed was their only future.  In short, women of Rwanda have seemingly had to make a lot of sacrifices.

I do think this short film presented Black female subjectivity.  I definitely felt like the Rwandan women were the subjects of God Sleeps in Rwanda.  It was packed with emotion and was good about telling stories through the women's perspective.  I mean, I felt nothing but sympathy for the individuals I saw in the film.

God sleeps in Rwanda

This film was very touching and at times hard to listen to. Hearing a woman genocide survivor talking about how terrible that travesty was gave me the viewer a great deal of sadness. Hearing her talk about almost aborting her child because she was one the militiamen, almost brought tears to my eyes because they showed the little girl playing and alive. The film was very interesting and taught me a lot of things. I didn't know that a woman was in charge of part of the raping's of during the genocide, how sick. The main scene that got me was when the documentary showed Fifi dying of AIDS. Seeing someone on their death bed, fighting for their life is way too hard for me to watch. I think this was a really good documentary and brought to light problems that we don't have to deal with, and made me a lot more appreciative of the life I live.

God sleeps in Rwanda

This short film gave me an entirely different outlook on the genocide in Rwanda. I wasn't aware that women were being raped during this horrible massacre. I felt a great deal of sadness for the women of this film because of the conflicts they had to conquered. I do believe that this short film demonstrates female subjectivity. Yes, the women identified in this film are being objectified, but the film does a magnificent job telling their story was grace and respect. The film doesn't just focus on the women being objectified, it also highlights the struggles that the women had to overcome.  

God Sleeps in Rwanda

After watching this short film, I learned many things about women in Rwanda. One of the most memorable pieces of the film for me was the fact that 70% of the population for Rwanda was women after the genocide of 1994. Despite this grisly fact, the film finds a way to document a sort of redemption paired with the shadow of loss hovering over all five of the women featured in the film.

As for Black female subjectivity, I think this film is magnificent. It tells us that this country is mostly populated by women and that this is indeed a story about women dealing with the aftermath of a horribly wounded society. These women have to reconstruct the lives they once knew and through their struggle, we are able to see their courage. Because of how close the film brings us with the "characters", we are able to at least try and understand what they are going through, even though we'll possibly never know for ourselves.

God Sleeps in Rwanda

God Sleeps in Rwanda made it clear that women’s lives in Rwanda are incredibly different from women’s lives elsewhere. Here, the women hastily acclimated themselves to a changed society while trying to move beyond the shadow of terrible, terrible tragedy. They put it on themselves to take up the opportunities that the country’s swift demographic shift presented. With that, the women keep forever-altered Rwanda from being altered solely through devastation. They embarked on an unflinching wave of progression, which can hopefully continue to develop and grow. I think that the film presents Black female subjectivity, considering the roles that these women have undertaken, and the depiction of their humanity in the face of struggle.

Yet, while women take on bigger societal roles and hold a majority in Rwandan parliament, it hasn’t kept lingering issues from looming large. Genocide survivors still have issues getting access to health care. Statistics from the Rwandan Men’s Resource Centre in 2011 show that gender-based violence is still a tremendous issue, having been experienced by 57.2% of the over 1300 women included in the study. 60% of families living in poverty are headed by women. Women in Rwanda are still nowhere near an enviable situation, and don’t get as much attention as they deserve.

The Women of Rwanda

It is extremely fascinating how resilient people can be after tragedy.

Though what brought the women of Rwanda into their current situation was catastrophic and inhumane (on so many levels), having seventy percent of the nation's population be of the female sex allows for the country progress for women's rights. I find the survivors to be inspirational in their endeavor to rebuild Rwanda and look forward to success of the country in the decades to come. This film did a fantastic job highlighting the struggles and successes of the women of Rwanda, portraying them as subjects of the film rather than objects.

One of the questions this circumstance--a mostly female-populated country--raises, though, is what will happen in the years to come when the population balances out? Will women retain these powerful positions within society? or will they regress back into their cultural norms?

...

On the note of the Rwanda Genocide, it is exceptionally repulsive that any person would suggest rape as a form of war crime; however, I find it to be a disgrace to all women and abhorrent that a woman in political power had such a hatred towards the Tutsi population to recommend this act of violence.

"God Sleeps in Rwanda"

The entire time that I was viewing this short film, a lot of emotions and thoughts occurred to me. First, I felt an overwhelming sadness for these women and children that had suffered for something that they were helpless to change. While the situation was vastly different, I saw certain parallels between this transition and the transition of American women after WW2. Rwandan women had very little rights prior to the genocide but following its conclusion they had to change their roles. Women finally gained their rights because of the absence of men; unfortunately, it wasn't because people had finally decided women were no less than men but they needed them in order to sustain society and survive.

I enjoyed the film because it did show how women were capable of surviving and capable of taking care of others. The women used their experiences to take care of others and raise the children in a new generation where they wanted them to be better and have better than they had. This female subjectivity is what helped change their position in society. With the absence of men, women are finally allowed to show their strengths and abilities. While incredibly sad that this atrocity is what it took for women to gain these rights, this film shows that these women are leaders and can rebuild whole societies.

Tutsi Genocide

I had previously heard details about the Tutsi genocide in Rwanda but this short film reflected more on the aftermath. I had no idea that over 200,000 women were raped and some infected with HIV. With most of the fathers dead and gone these women are going through hell economically and their health is failing. I do think this film displays Black female subjectivity. On one had the women were being used and objectified however that imagery was withheld. The film focuses pretty much only on Black women in africa and explores the different elements of their life and their struggles, from a empathetic viewpoint.

The Big Lie

The "Big Lie" that is presented to us in romantic novels and scripts is a misconception of how things actually play out regarding our intimate encounters with the opposite sex. Young women are almost brainwashed into believing in some clichè process of falling in love while young men are receiving a different message. What Manatu said about young boys learning about the opposite sex via porn and young girls via romance films was spot-on. Alot of women grow up dreaming of an ideal wedding for their future, and if not they've definitely gave it some thought. I have yet to encounter a male with a similar thought process. With that being said, once the two genders come together problems may occur, and viewpoints may collide all due to different expectations. Happily Ever After certainly doesn't reflect the rising divorce rates in today's society.

Blog 13

I have viewed part of the short film, God Sleeps in Rwanda, before, so I knew what it was about; however, this was the first time I viewed the short film in its entirety.  From the short film, I learned that before the genocide, women's lives in Rwanda were plain and somewhat boring because they did not have any rights, so all they did mostly all day was just take care of their family.  Many of the women were only teenagers when the genocide happened, so they lost their mothers and fathers at a young age, and although they had to face these hard times without their parents and some of their siblings, the women started to gain more rights after the genocide, such as becoming more political, voting, being able to go to school and get decent jobs, etc.  Even though the women's lives still may not be perfect because they still have those terrible memories, and some are still fighting to feed their families, they have hope that their children's futures will be much brighter and will be given more opportunities.
For the most part, I think this short film, God Sleeps in Rwanda, presents Black female subjectivity.  During the genocide, the women were raped and beaten, which drastically increased their chances of getting HIV/AIDS, so that makes the Black females objects because they are only seen as sexual.  However, after the genocide, Black females were seen as subjects because they were becoming political and being elected in higher roles, they had real jobs that men used to only have, such as police officers, and they were still going to school at night to get an even higher education and get even better jobs, such as lawyers.  The Black women were doing all of this still while taking care of their families and supporting all of their children; therefore, the short film represents them as subjects because it shows that they can do it all on their own without needing help from anyone.

God Sleeps in Rwanda

Dear Class,

Please find below the film God Sleeps in Rwanda, which is the film that you are asked to discuss in your blog due April 29th.

God Sleeps in Rwanda from Kehau Ahu on Vimeo.

"The Big Lie"

I really enjoyed this reading by Mantu, which discusses "The Big Lie," the heteronormative idea that women sit around and wait for men to come sweep them off of their feet and save them from whatever circumstances they are faced with. This is problematic for a few reasons. One, like Lacey said, this is a heteronormative idea, meaning that this only works for people who are heterosexual (women seeking man, vise versa) which is excluding a pretty big chunk of people in the first place. Secondly, these ideas depicted in film and literature are definitely not what every woman or man is looking for. Thirdly, this is not the kind of idea society should be feeding to young men and women. For example, pop artist Katy Perry has a song titled, "Not Like The Movies," where Perry sings, "It's not like the movies/that's how it should be"  Like the title of the chapter says, it truly is a big lie. Life is just that, life, it is real and different for everyone person who experiences theirs, films and music and books, they're often a work of creative fiction. Setting yourself up for a love 'like the movies" may not get you very far and more than likely will have negative effects rather than positive ones.

The "Big Lie"

The facade illustrated by romance novels and films is the notion of "happily ever after."  There is a strict storyline that romance novels and films follow that doesn't always coincide with real life.  The idea in romance narratives is one of heteronormativity.  It is the idea that women seek their one true love their whole life and eventually find him.  The two may go through a few trials and tribulations, but when all is said and done, they live "happily ever after."  This repetitive plot found in many mainstream films (and multitude of novels) makes an unspoken promise to women that this is how life is; and if one's life does not correspond with that sort of narrative, then it must not be true love.  The unspoken promise aforementioned results in a society of women looking for the picture perfect romance.  This can have some pretty negative consequences, one being on one's self-esteem if "true love" is not found or doesn't play out the way it's "supposed" to.  This can also result in a mixed up world, especially if the fact that men get their ideas about relationships from porn reigns true.

The "Great Lie"

The "Great Lie" that romance novels and films present to women, as discussed by Manatu on page 57 when referring to Haskell, is "women's inferiority status" as reinforced by film "through the dialectic of gender differences." It has to do with the suppression of a female's individuality, all of her different facets, ideas, and dreams are thrown to the side, while the male is encouraged to explore and pursue whatever he may wish. For an example, a female's sexuality is suppressed, while the male's is promoted. This whole notion is perpetuated in popular cinema without enough critical attention by viewers. The "Happily Ever After" narrative is the final carrying through of this lie. Once the female submits to the male, is feminine, but not oversexed, and is domesticated, she can be supported by the male. Again, it's a silly thing that is certainly troublesome in terms of gender relations, but it has made money at the box office and often goes unchallenged, thus keeping it alive.

Poetic Justice

After watching the first nine minutes of Poetic Justice, break into a small groups and discuss the aesthetics. Pay attention to intertextuality, diegetic and non diegetic sound, color, lighting, camera movement, dialogue, and the entire filmic diegesis.

Poetic Justice: http://vimeo.com/40537464

The Big Lie

I believe that the "big lie" that romance films tell women is that eventually you will find your one true love and you guys will get married and live "Happily Ever After". Realistically, this will never happen. Not saying that as women we will never find someone to spend the rest of our life with, but the way that films portray it, isn't realistic. I'm not a huge fan of the Romance Genre because its' so predictable.

Manatu

The "Great lie" that romance novels and films present is this sort of socially embedded outlook that restricts how female characters are depicted. It restricts the complex things about their personalities like ambitions, sexuality, and intelligence. The "Happily Ever After" narrative fits well with this part. It is this sort of narrative that represses these interesting things about female characters. These narratives depict men as ambitions go getters out to solve problems and progress while women are depicted as contented characters looking to settle down and stay put.

The "Big Lie"

In my opinion, romance novels and films present a lot of "lies" and perpetuate a false idea of reality. Most romance stories in books and movies follow a similar pattern; boy meets girl, some kind of spark happens, a conflict occurs, and then finally, the conflict is resolved leading to a happy ending. Not all follow this completely down to every step, but the ideas are always the same. The man is supposed to be romantic and attentive to the needs of the woman while the woman is supposed to be rescued and improved by the man.

Most women are looking for their "happily ever after" and are striving to find that with every relationship. The problem is the way that they movies portray this. Women expect to be swept off their feet by men and get that princess wedding that they've seen in the movies, but that is not reflective of reality and true relationships. A lot of women are stuck because their expectations about romance in life are reflective of the movies, but I think that if a woman can be accepting of the fact that life is not a movie, we can move on and stop chasing that fallacy.

The Truth About "Happily Ever After"

Rom-coms and romance novels all tell the same story using a different version: boy meets girl; boy and/or girl is with the wrong lover(s); boy and/or girl dump lover(s); other small conflict(s) ensue; boy and girl fall in love; they live happily ever after... THE END. The "Big Lie" about these types of stories in media is that the once-upon-a-times and happily-ever-afters are not an accurate representation of reality which leads to the confusion of real women in the real world who attempt to find this mythological ideology of "true love." Stories of eventually finding your knight in shining armor or of kissing a frog who magically transforms into a prince are strictly fantasy, yet (female) audiences interpret them as depictions of reality leading women on a wild goose chase to find their "soul mate." Because of the power mainstream media have on audiences, women are confused and dissatisfied when real men don't live up to the unrealistic or fantastical expectations set for them. They, then thinking they made a poor decision, will leave their partner in search of yet another wild goose chase allowing the vicious circle to continue.

Blog 12

I believe the "Big Lie" that romance novels and films present to women is how the journey of the love actually goes.  In the books and films, the male and female characters have either just met, and it is love at first sight, or they have known each other for quite some time and realize they are meant for one another.  They get together, date and have a relationship, something climatic happens that causes them to have a disagreement and break-up but then in the end, they realize they actually do love each other, so they get back together, and the film or novel usually ends happily.  Not all romance films follow this diagram because some have endings where the two characters do not end up together; however, audiences do not like these endings, so if an author, producer and/or director wants something successful, they will follow the diagram.  These stories give women hope, but it is more of a false hope and not reality because it hardly happens that way.  Romance films give women high expectations of how men should be, so when a man is not actually romantic, loving and caring, the woman gets upset.
I have never really thought of it this way, but the function of the "Happily Ever After" narrative is mainly for the women viewers. In terms of gender relations, the film or novel ends how a women would picture a love story ending, but that is not entirely the case for men.  There are some men out there who are romantic and somewhat similar to characters in films and novels, but the majority of men are not; therefore, the "Happily Ever After" narrative is meant to be leave a feel-good feeling after viewing the film or reading the novel, but it just so happens that that feeling is left in women.

bell hooks and Hoop Dreams

I also think bell hooks may have been a little critical of them film, but not without reason. It's like Biggie says in his song Things Done Changed, "either you're slinging crack rock or you got a wicked jump shot." The successful black basketball player is a common and often used stereotype, and although it is not necessarily a negative stereotype, it's a stereotype none the less. I see what everyone is saying when they say that race isn't the emphasis of the film and that the film could have worked with a person of any color, but if that's true, why didn't that happen?

Hoop Dreams

Having not seen the documentary film, Hoop Dreams, but having read what bell hooks had to say about the film, as well as her other critiques we have read thus far, I am going to have to agree with the many others who say that bell hooks seems to overanalyze at times.  When I watched the trailer for Hoop Dreams, it appeared to be a documentary about two boys who have a dream of playing professional basketball - not that it was about exploiting their bodies - and that type of story line could have the potentiality to inspire.  However, hooks also mentions that Hoop Dreams reinforces this notion that the sports arena is the only arena black males can be successful in.  I will say this: I would be lying if I said I have never thought this very thing.  Not about Hoop Dreams in particular, because, again, I have never seen the film, but it is an interesting thing when black males make up a large portion of America's athletes (opposed to other professions), while many coaches are white males.  I definitely think this is one topic that deserves further exploration.

Hoop Dreams

Having seen and enjoyed Hoop Dreams a few times in the past, I was a bit biased coming into the bell hooks piece on it. I think it's a tough choice of film to pick apart, given that it is an impressively longitudinal documentary, it's low-budget, and it's made by a man who has since done work like The Interrupters, a similarly critically acclaimed and beloved film about a group trying to stop street violence. While the trailer applauds the quest for the American Dream, it seems mostly a selling style, as most of the film is realer than that. I don't necessarily agree with hooks on who she thinks is being portrayed as "triumphant" or "defeated" at certain points in the film. And while all films shape reality in their own ways, I differ with hooks in her sensing of "suggestions" in the film. "The film suggests that it is only their potential to be exploited... that makes this dream a potential nightmare," is one line I thought saw parts of the film too simply. And I think many of the things hooks notes, such as exposure of the commodification of Black men, are necessary to see in a documentary, as that can led to further recognition of the problem and possibly change.

Hoops Dreams

I'm gonna have to say that Hooks seems to be far too critical of Black American cinema films in general. When she finds something good about a film, she manages to find about three more things that she finds the film at fault, such as the "overuse" of Black American stereotypes. Sure the film had Black Americans with a great love for basketball, but that was the point of the film. I'm sure that there are a great deal of people who have a love for basketball, black, white or otherwise. Sure it is not the perfect film for everyone, but then again, when has there been a perfect film?

hoops dream

I completely agree with Alexis. I feel like Hooks over analyzes black films all together. It seems like there isn't one acceptable Black Cinema film in her eyes. She's way too critical and I think that causes her to over look some of the good attributes of films. She liked some things in "hoop dreams" but with every compliment came a complaint. I think that this was a well portrayed film of the men (black in this case) who had an extreme love and dedication for the sport of basketball. I really didn't see any fault in this film, but maybe I just don't think critically enough.

Hoop dreams

Bell Hooks seems like she has some personal issues toward any black cinema in my opinion. Hoop Dreams was praised for being an accurate portrayal of young black youth and basketball, yet Hooks finds a way to say that the film portrayed the black youth (well, their bodies) as "commodities" for whites. I understand it's Hooks' job to pick apart films and find the underline issue with them, but I would say she over-analyzes just a tad bit.

Hoop Dreams

In my opinion, the trailer doesn't necessarily frame the film in a way to correctly demonstrate its cultural significance. From the uplifting, gentle tone of this trailer, one might assume that it is about triumph and victory, about success and winning. While both players in the film experience victory on the basketball court, they ultimately experience failure when it comes to their dreams. Arthur Agee and William Gates both went on to play Division I ball, but neither reached their goal of playing in the NBA. This trailer doesn't really communicate that at all.

As for bell hooks' view of the film, I strongly disagree. I don't think of the film as a triumphant look at the American dream, but rather a deep, two lane character study. Arthur Agee and William Gates weren't symbols of any problems or issues in society. They were young men with hopes and wishes and families along with them.

I believe any player, despite racial distinctions, would've qualified for coverage in the film if that player could've shown more drive and desire than Agee or Gates. bell hooks entered the theater with a bias. She even talks about how uncomfortable she is watching the film with a white audience. Its a bit unfair to write off the trials of these two athletes as a gimmick or as something laced with an ulterior agenda. If you've seen the film, you know how compelling it is, how heartbreaking certain scenes are. Arthur Agee's interaction with his younger siblings and William Gates' tears after a loss come to mind. There is a scene in the film where Arthur Agee's father plays basketball with him and then buys crack on the same court he just played on. These types of images, contrary to what some might believe, are not synonymous with any race or nationality. All human beings are subject to this type of behavior and by showing this, the filmmakers effectively portray the obstacles standing between the two athletes and their dreams.

Hoop Dreams

Unsurprisingly, Hooks found fault in "Hoop Dreams", but she also had some positive things to say. She liked the portrayal of the mothers but claimed that while the film is attempting to get away from some stereotyped, it ends up upholding and reinforcing many of them. She is critical of the idea presented that if you work hard (are good at a sport) you can escape your circumstances. I tended to disagree with her analysis of this because I thought the film showed the two boys/men in a positive light and that their determination and focus on the sport of basketball was admirable. They worked hard and did escape their circumstance, but I think that's great and I find no fault in that idea.

Transformative films

Using women as sexual objects while remaining transformative can be very difficult although it's doable. To do so effectively there must be some sort of subliminal message or a few moments of insight into the characters consciousness. The women cannot just perform the demeaning acts, they must show glimpses of good moral character throughout other scenes in the movie for it to work.

God Sleeps in Rwanda

The images shown in the short clip of God Sleeps in Rwanda were sometimes jarring and uncomfortable. After watching the video, I felt a highly respectable attitude toward the filmmaking and photojournalism that went into the film’s production for its commitment to show a side of reality as depicted by black women in Rwanda and their intention of giving these women a voice/sense of empowerment to the things happening around them. I think the film presents black female subjectivity because its a production by women reporters who frame the storyline through the lives of five women. 

“Big Lie”

The "big lie" of romance films is the way the films frame love and relationships to be viewed at as better than being alone. Although I didn't necessarily like "The Break-up" starring Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaughn, I thought it was more satisfying when the couple didn't get back together in the end. It was a real representation of real relationships and presented an alternative to the "happily ever after" narrative. 

Hoop Dreams

I appreciate hooks’ honesty in all of her critical film reviews/assessments. In her critical analysis of Hoop Dreams, she examines the role viewers play when watching images of race and defines viewers who are critically aware as "enlightened witnesses.” I support Hooks' argument and the notion that people should be more critical and open minded when viewing any form of media on screen. Also, I like her counter argument on the narrative in Hoop Dreams as showing a form of institutionalized racism as it exists in the film because it reflects a completely different representation of the film than the trailer's framework of the documentary.

Hoop Dreams

As I continue to read bell hooks' essays, it is abundantly clear that she is consistently taking the oppositional view to almost every film she discusses. Her analysis of the 1994 documentary Hoop Dreams, in comparison to the raving reviews of critics and moviegoers alike, highlights this conflicting perspective hooks has towards black cinema. While Hoop Dreams received numerous praises for its insightful and passionate storytelling of Arthur Agee's and William Gates' routes to fame in attempt to become professional basketball players. Most viewed the film as a genuine depiction of the lives of young athletes trying to achieve the American Dream. hooks, on the other hand, interpreted the film as media representation which reinforced black parental stereotypes and emphasized the idea that black male bodies are seen only as commodities for the "white supremacist capitalist patriarchy" that is American society. She views the film as one which focuses on all the wrong issues asserting that the filmmakers didn't discuss how becoming a successful athlete is (what she considers) the only way poor black youth can make it in America. I am interested in viewing the film as to see where I believe the film guides audiences and to uncover whether or not hooks' claims are accurate.

Blog 11

After watching the trailer for the documentary, Hoop Dreams, I felt inspired and uplifted. In the matter of 1 minute and 38 seconds, the producers and directors managed to get the point across about what the documentary is about, while also making the audience feel how they want you to feel. Also in that short amount of time, they showed how the main characters went from a working social class and basically having nothing to having about everything they ever dreamed about and achieving the American Dream. It also showed that not every Black male fits the stereotype of being a Black male, in that they are poor, lazy thugs, because they can be successful and achieve dreams with hard work and dedication.
Personally, I have not seen the film, but from watching the trailer, I would not completely agree with bell hooks' assessment of the film. Although I would not agree with her completely, I would agree that it fits the stereotype of Blacks being athletes and succeeding in doing so, but at the same time, one has to remember that it is a documentary, so it is about people's lives, and these two individuals just so happen to have had dreams of playing in the NBA. The trailer has intrigued me, and now, I am wanting to watch it, so I can compare her thoughts of it not being as good as it is praised to be.

bell hooks

I think that black women can be seen as sex workers could also be depicted as transformative, if the film is done right. It can show a new view of women as not just some sex objects. A huge example is of the character Foxy Brown from the film Film Six. Foxy only got into the sex industry as a phone sex partner as a way to avoid being seen as a sex object on the screen. It can cause a soul search for the place of women, and their potential powerlessness in certain industries.

Black Women As Sex Workers

I do believe that a film can portray black women (and all women) as sex workers in such a way that can be transformative.  In the example given by bell hooks in Reel to Real, the character Foxy Brown in Girl 6 only seeks her job as a phone sex specialist after being denied a job in the film industry because she refused to be sexually objectified on the big screen.  This has a profound message behind it.  When done in creative way, such as the way Spike Lee produced Girl 6, films can possess a greater meaning within their own plots, and thus, disperse a more deep, intelligent, serious message throughout society.

bell hooks

I think that a filmmaker can can represent Black women as sex workers in a way that is cinematically transformative. A lot of the possibility to do so lies in having a foundation of appropriate narrative components and taking the steps laid out by bell hooks for such a re-framing. Representation is a big part of that. A film would need to consider new representations of liberatory sexuality and a challenging of the notions of "the eroticism of the patriarchal phallic imaginary." The characters must be complex, and shouldn't be portrayed as victims, as properly done in Girl 6. It must also not dwell solely on one section of race, sex, or class, but consider all, as in Exotica.

Bell hooks

For filmmakers to represent black women as sex workers and to make such an action trans-formative , in my opinion the filmmaker must not ignore the race of the women, in fact, the race of the women should be the first priority. The fact that the women are black is problematic within itself.

hook

I think that it is possible for filmmakers to represent black females as sex workers in a transformative way, but I think that it would be very hard to do.
I completely agree with Valerie, in order for this to happen, the female character needs to have more depth, we need more knowledge of the characters background as to why they had to choose this job to acquire the job of their dreams, make it literally the last option.

In Spike Lee's "Girl 6" she turned down all other sexual demanding jobs, and was forced to become a phone sex operator in order to make a living and to get to achieve her dream of becoming an actress. I like this because it gave the character some morals, she was almost forced to take this job, I think that spike lee did  a really good job of transforming and developing this character into a person that the viewers had sympathy for.